Why Other Models Fall Short

The stablecoin and RWA landscape is filled with promising concepts that ultimately fail to deliver on their core promises. Understanding these limitations is crucial to appreciating why Tharwa's approach represents a fundamental breakthrough.

Systematic Failure Patterns in Current Models

Most existing stablecoin models exhibit predictable failure patterns that institutional allocators recognize and avoid:

Structural Vulnerabilities

Operational Limitations

Tharwa's Different Approach

Where others see trade-offs, Tharwa sees opportunities for innovation:

• Diversification over concentration

• Intelligence over static rules

• Proactive over reactive management

• Real yield over empty promises

The following sections examine each failed model in detail, showing exactly why they fall short and how Tharwa addresses their fundamental flaws.

---

Navigate the Analysis

• Algorithmic Stablecoins →

• Overcollateralized Stablecoins →

• Single-Asset RWA Protocols →

• Fiat-Backed Stablecoins →